LineTime.org : Guemes Island Ferry Committee
 |
April
26, 2006
Skagit
County Board of Commissioners
1801 Continental Place
Mt. Vernon, WA 98273
RE:
Extended Ferry Service
Dear
Commissioners,
We
would like to request on behalf of your constituents on Guemes Island
that the BOCC postpone consideration of extending ferry service beyond
the last scheduled 6 PM ferry Monday through Thursday. As the elected
representatives of the Guemes Ferry ridership, we are compelled to share
our concerns regarding the proposed schedule revision with you.
There
are numerous reasons that more time is needed to study and evaluate
both the expected and unexpected consequences of extended service:
1) According to
Public Works, the 2006-07 ferry budget is projected to have a one
million dollar shortfall. The cost of “extended service”
has been calculated at $304,682 by Public Works using a four-person
crew. In a recent letter to the Ferry Committee, Norma Brummett, Skagit
Co. Auditor, (responding to our question about viable, less expensive
cash handling alternatives than hiring a fourth person), states that
Public Works has told her that they now consider the fourth person
“permanent”. This addition to the cost of labor has been
calculated to be $190,000 per year within the current schedule. Continued
escalation of ferry operational costs is not only being paid in higher
fares by the Guemes Ferry ridership but is a burden to County taxpayers
as well. The cost of extended service will neutralize the projected
$300,000 revenue gain from the January, 2006 fare increase. Faced
with escalating expenditures and a budget shortfall, businesses and
governmental organizations typically reduce levels of services not
increase them.
2) The Guemes
Island Sub Area Plan, which has been authorized by a Resolution and
signed by the BOCC is a work in progress. This sub-area planning process
should be allowed to continue until its completion before making a
decision on extended service in order to remain in compliance with
the Growth Management Act. The potential impact of extended service
also has to be examined for compliance with Skagit County’s
Critical Areas Ordinance under which Guemes Island receives additional
protection because it is Federally recognized and designated as a
“Sole Source Aquifer”. Other existing policies in the
Skagit Comp. Plan Transportation Element refer to the expansion of
transportation into rural areas. For example, Policy 9A-6.1 “Skagit
County supports expansion of public transportation service into the
unincorporated areas only with public support.” We suggest a
review of these and other pertinent planning policies prior to any
extension of ferry service to Guemes Island.
3) The American
Institute of Architects (AIA) has just begun a “Sustainability”
study on Guemes. As you are aware, a team of scientists and other
professionals from across the country has been commissioned to assist
Guemes Island in improving sustainability practices. The study will
address ferry issues as one of the components of sustainability. This
study is scheduled for completion later this year. It would be premature
to make changes in the ferry schedule prior to the results of this
study being available as part of the decision-making process. Extending
the schedule beyond 6PM, Monday through Thursday, will have far-reaching
consequences related to the sustainability of the Island. You, as
County Commissioners and all stakeholders in this issue need to have
access to the information from this study before important decisions
are made regarding changes in the ferry schedule.
4) The January, 2006 fare increases doubled the cost
for most frequent users because the use of a fare recovery model was
abandoned. Inclusion of capital expenditures with operational expenses
resulted in revenue targets far in excess of any other transportation
system in the State of Washington.
In
response to recommendations that Public Works seek sources other than
the County road fund for capital expenditures, PW made its first trip
to Olympia to visit C.R.A.B (County Road Administration Board) to apply
for funds to use for capital improvements to ferry facilities. Denial
of this application has postponed possible funding from C.R.A.B. for
two years. The wear and tear on the vessel and facilities caused by
the proposed extended service will require additional expenditures to
facilities and the vessel beyond the cost of labor. Presently, PW has
postponed planned improvements to the terminals because of lack of funds.
How can the County afford extended service under these conditions?
We
urge the Board of County Commissioners to postpone any further discussion
of extended service until the above listed issues are resolved. In a
recent advisory vote by registered Guemes Island voters, nearly 75%
were against extended service. Once extended service is initiated, even
on a “trial basis”, it will be impossible to withdraw much
like the “fourth person” which was only to be temporary.
Extended service will unleash a host of expenses and unintended change
that neither the County nor the ferry riders and residents of Guemes
can afford.
Sincerely,
GUEMES ISLAND FERRY
COMMITTEE
cc: Chal Martin,
Steve Cox
|
|